It seems you are located in Latin America. Apply for a job on our career site.
Or head back to Vintti.com to start hiring.
We're a headhunter agency that connects US businesses with elite LATAM professionals who integrate seamlessly as remote team members — aligned to US time zones, cutting overhead by 70%.
We’ll match you with Latin American superstars who work your hours. Quality talent, no time zone troubles. Starting at $9/hour.
Start Hiring For FreeTransitioning to the new lease accounting standards can be extremely challenging for accountants and businesses.
But with the right lease accounting software solution, compliance can be streamlined - achieving accuracy while saving time and resources.
In this comparative review, we dig deep into the top lease accounting tools - benchmarking core functions from reporting to user experience. Discover which platform emerges as the #1 recommendation, empowering your organization's smooth adoption of ASC 842 for leasing success.
With the adoption of ASC 842 lease accounting standards, companies are faced with new compliance requirements for financial reporting. To help manage the transition, many are turning to lease accounting software. This enables automation of lease data collection, calculation, journal entries, disclosures and more. However, with many options on the market, it can be challenging to determine which solution best fits your business needs.
This comparative review aims to provide an overview of key factors to consider when researching lease accounting platforms. It will examine functionality, ease of use, customer support and pricing models of top rated options. The goal is to arm financial decision makers with the knowledge to select software that will improve lease accounting efficiency. With the right technology in place, your business can focus on strategic priorities rather than manual processes. Continue reading for insights and recommendations when embarking on your lease accounting software selection process.
The key differences between ASC 840 and ASC 842 lease accounting standards are:
ASC 840
ASC 842
Under ASC 842, initial direct costs are defined as incremental costs of a lease that would not have been incurred if the lease had not been obtained. This is a narrower definition than under ASC 840, where incremental direct costs could include internal costs as well as external costs like legal fees, even if incurred before the lease was obtained.
The new standard aims to increase transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from leases on the balance sheet. This closes loopholes that allowed companies to keep substantial lease obligations off their balance sheets through operating leases. Overall, ASC 842 significantly changes the accounting treatment for leases to provide more clarity and consistency.
The latest lease accounting standards in the United States consist of ASC 842 and GASB 87 & 96. These were introduced by FASB and GASB to significantly change how leases are recorded on financial statements.
Internationally, IFRS 16 is the new lease accounting standard issued by the IASB. Much like ASC 842, it alters the classification and measurement of leases.
These new standards require that most leases be capitalized and recorded on the balance sheet. Only short-term agreements can remain off-balance sheet. This increases transparency into a company's financial leverage and assets under their control.
The goal is to eliminate off-balance sheet financing and create a more accurate picture of leasing obligations. This will standardize lease accounting across organizations and enable better financial analysis and comparisons.
Adhering to ASC 842, GASB 87/96 or IFRS 16 requires detailed tracking of hundreds of leases. Lease accounting software is invaluable for complying with the new standards efficiently.
ASC 842 and IFRS 16 have some key differences in how they define and treat short-term leases.
Per IFRS 16, a short-term lease is a lease with a term of 12 months or less that does not include a purchase option. These leases can be accounted for similar to operating leases.
ASC 842 defines a short-term lease as a lease with a term of 12 months or less that does not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. These leases are accounted for differently than operating leases.
The key difference is that under ASC 842, a short-term lease must meet both criteria - having a maximum term of 12 months AND not having a purchase option the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. Under IFRS 16, a short-term lease only needs to meet the 12 month term criteria, regardless of whether there is a purchase option.
So in summary, ASC 842 has a more narrow definition of a short-term lease. Understanding these subtle differences between the standards is important when configuring lease accounting software to ensure compliance. As regulations continue to converge over time, awareness of where key variances exist allows businesses to adapt more smoothly.
Prior to ASC 842, lease accounting was governed by ASC 840. Here are some key differences between the old and new lease accounting standards:
Under ASC 840, operating lease liabilities were generally not recognized on the balance sheet. However, under ASC 842, companies are required to recognize operating lease liabilities on the balance sheet. This substantially impacts the balance sheet for many companies.
ASC 842 provides revised guidance on what constitutes a lease. Certain service contracts may now qualify as leases under the new standard. This can impact whether an arrangement needs to be accounted for as a lease.
Lease expense recognition is impacted by ASC 842. Expenses are generally higher in the early years of a lease and lower in the later years under the new standard. This is due to the interest expense component.
Companies adopting ASC 842 can choose between the full retrospective transition method or allowing certain practical expedients on adoption. The transition method can significantly impact timing of implementation.
In summary, the recognition of operating lease liabilities on the balance sheet is one of the most significant differences between ASC 840 and new lease standard ASC 842. There are also revised guidelines around what constitutes a lease and changes to expense recognition.
ASC 842 introduces major changes to lease accounting standards. As companies adopt these new standards, having the right software is critical for efficient compliance and reporting. This section provides an overview of ASC 842 and outlines key capabilities lease accounting solutions must have.
ASC 842 is the result of a joint project between the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to improve financial reporting transparency.
The new standards seek to address inconsistencies in the accounting treatment of leased assets. Unlike owned assets which were capitalized, leased assets were previously kept off balance sheets creating opportunities to obscure financial leverage.
By recognizing lease assets and liabilities on balance sheets, ASC 842 enables investors and stakeholders to better evaluate companies' operating and financing decisions.
ASC 842 introduces sweeping changes from prior US GAAP lease accounting:
In light of these changes, relying on manual processes or outdated tools will prove inadequate under the new standards. Adopting purpose-built ASC 842 software is essential.
To effectively manage compliance, lease accounting systems must address:
Lease data centralization
ASC 842 calculations
Disclosure management
Ongoing compliance
By leveraging software with robust ASC 842 compliance capabilities, accountants can effectively meet the new standards while optimizing efficiency.
As accounting professionals navigate the complex new standards introduced by ASC 842, having the right lease accounting software is critical. We conducted extensive research to identify and thoroughly evaluate the top lease accounting platforms available.
Our rigorous selection methodology focused on solutions that enable accountants to achieve ASC 842 compliance with greater efficiency. We cherry-picked options that are easy to use while still packing robust accounting capabilities. Customer reviews and market presence also factored into our choices.
We applied the following key criteria to select the most promising lease accounting systems for in-depth benchmarking:
To deeply evaluate the selected lease accounting systems, our methodology included:
After applying our rigorous selection criteria, we chose the following lease accounting platforms to evaluate head-to-head:
The combination of market leadership, ASC 842-focused capabilities, usability, and positive customer feedback among these solutions positioned them as top contenders for further benchmarking.
In the next sections, we dive deeper into the capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses uncovered during our evaluation of these top lease accounting software options.
As businesses adopt the new lease accounting standards, they must carefully evaluate software solutions to streamline compliance. This section provides an in-depth feature analysis of leading options—from core functionality to pricing models—to help accountants determine the best fit.
All lease accounting platforms offer the essential calculations, amortization schedules, and journal entries needed for ASC 842/IFRS 16. However, the depth and configurability varies.
EZ Lease and Lease Crunch provide straightforward lease calculations and accounting. However, they lack robust customization for complex lease types or modifications.
Visual Lease and LeaseQuery excel in flexible lease modeling and “what-if” scenario planning. Users can adjust assumptions during the lease term to analyze impacts. However, LeaseQuery’s financial reporting lacks multi-book functionality.
Overall, Visual Lease leads in core accounting capabilities with support for virtually any lease type, modification, or assumption changes over time. The dynamic calculation engine and intelligent automation enables significant time savings.
Proper lease disclosure tracking and reporting is imperative for compliance. Solutions must provide auditable reports and disclosures per ASC 842/IFRS 16.
EZ Lease’s fixed reports cover basic disclosure needs but offers little customization. LeaseQuery provides strong out-of-the-box reports but also allows custom reporting using its lease data warehouse.
Visual Lease shines with its new Visual Lease Disclosure product that centralizes all reporting and disclosures in an intuitive interface. The auditable reports and instant disclosures reduce audit preparation by over 50% for many customers. For advanced needs, users can also build custom reports using field-level lease data.
Overall, Visual Lease Disclosure stands out as the most user-friendly disclosure management system that interoperates directly with the Visual Lease accounting engine.
An intuitive user experience and straightforward setup facilitates employee adoption across the organization. Solutions should offer rich self-service training content with responsive customer support channels.
Capterra reviewers often praise LeaseQuery’s clean interface and logical workflow. However, multiple touchpoints between modules can be cumbersome. Visual Lease provides a unified platform for end-to-end lease accounting. Its interactive dashboards, guided workflows, and customizable homepages accelerate productivity.
Most platforms offer simplified data migration and implementation packages. Lease Crunch stands out with its rapid 3-5 day setup process. Visual Lease also aims to deliver ROI quickly thanks to its templatized services for common client scenarios.
Considering the holistic user experience, Visual Lease strikes the optimal balance between user-friendly design, integrated modules, and tailored onboarding. Resources like its Admin University foster lasting self-sufficiency.
Reliable customer service can make or break user experiences. When evaluating options, assess responsiveness across email, phone, chat, knowledge bases, and community forums.
EZ Lease only provides email and phone support with limited self-help content. This can result in slow responses for complex questions. Visual Lease offers multi-channel support with a rich knowledge base, moderated forum, and U.S.-based advisors. Customers praise Visual Lease’s remarkably fast response times and high-touch support.
Overall, Visual Lease clearly leads in customer service experience, earning a perfect G2 user satisfaction rating. Support channels align to users’ preferred engagement style while human advisors rapidly resolve complex issues.
Budget constraints play a key role in software selection. Yet assessing true value requires looking beyond upfront license fees at the total cost of ownership and long-term productivity gains.
EZ Lease and Lease Crunch offer lower base pricing but skimp on capabilities, scalability, and support. Customers may face rising costs over time as needs evolve. Meanwhile, platforms like Visual Lease balance robust functionality with fair value across customer segments. Volume discounts are also available.
For growing SMBs to large enterprises, Visual Lease provides a full-fledged lease accounting engine with disclosure management at a reasonable price point given extensive process efficiencies. Further savings come from its risk-free implementation guarantee.
Visual Lease is the leading lease accounting software on the market today. It provides robust ASC 842/IFRS 16 compliance capabilities, powerful reporting, intuitive workflows, and seamless integrations with top ERPs like NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics, and more.
Key benefits include:
With proven success helping major public and private companies transition to the new lease accounting standards, Visual Lease is the go-to choice for CFOs, controllers, and accounting teams seeking an end-to-end lease accounting compliance solution.
For larger enterprises managing vast real estate portfolios, LeaseAccelerator offers robust global lease accounting capabilities tailored specifically for complex business needs.
Key strengths LeaseAccelerator brings include:
With LeaseAccelerator, massive global corporations can streamline lease compliance across business units and geographies. While pricing skews higher for large deployments, LeaseAccelerator delivers value by automating lease management at scale.
For small to mid-sized business seeking quality lease accounting software on a budget, LeaseCrunch offers excellent value.
Though capabilities are more basic than premium tools, LeaseCrunch provides vital ASC 842 compliance features including:
While LeaseCrunch lacks advanced analytics of premium platforms, its affordable pricing and focus providing core lease accounting compliance deliver practical value for budget-conscious accountants. Paired with strong customer service, LeaseCrunch gives SMBs an easy lease accounting solution without breaking the bank.
Shares best practices for rolling out and adopting new lease software to enable compliance.
Implementing new lease accounting software is key for financial compliance, but can be disruptive if not managed properly. Here are some best practices when rolling out new solutions:
Following a thoughtful roadmap gets all stakeholders aligned while minimizing disruption during software implementation. Investing upfront enables long-term compliance.
The best lease accounting software is ineffective without proper user adoption across the organization. Consider these strategies to drive engagement:
Proactive adoption strategies lead to stickier user behavior over time. Nurturing engagement ensures lease accounting software delivers lasting value.
Lease accounting software like LeaseCrunch enables ASC 842/IFRS 16 compliance. But maintaining standards requires ongoing vigilance as leases evolve, including:
With the right discipline around lease data governance, solutions like LeaseCrunch sustain compliance over the long run as standards continue to tighten.
The lease accounting software market continues to mature and improve based on advancements in technology and user feedback. Several innovative capabilities are on the horizon that could enhance functionality and further simplify compliance for accountants.
Artificial intelligence and process automation will likely be incorporated to minimize manual tasks and provide deeper, more predictive insights from data. For example, machine learning algorithms could help automatically classify leases based on terms, calculate adjustments, update journals, generate disclosures, and more. This could significantly reduce the time and effort required for accountants to maintain standards.
Natural language processing may also enable the software to read lease contracts and extract salient details. Rather than needing staff to comb through agreements and manually input critical lease components, the system could automatically capture key information to accelerate setup.
Modern data visualization techniques, such as interactive charts and graphs, could provide new ways to analyze trends, search lease information, and spot anomalies. More dynamic reporting features may also emerge to produce financial statements, supplement disclosures, and track KPIs tailored to various stakeholder needs. This could augment transparency and decision making.
Tighter integration between lease accounting platforms and other enterprise systems like ERPs, TMS, and data warehouses could minimize duplication of efforts. Continued development of APIs enables smoother, real-time synchronization across tools. This consolidated view makes it easier to connect leasing activities to their downstream accounting and financial impacts.
As technology progresses, lease accounting software will likely incorporate more touchless functionality, actionable insights, and connectivity to related business processes. While upcoming innovations may not completely eliminate the complexities of compliance, they are positioned to meaningfully streamline this challenging area for accountants.
As companies navigate the complex new standards for lease accounting, having the right software is essential for both compliance and streamlining efficiency. This guide has provided an overview of key factors to consider when evaluating lease accounting solutions.
To ensure you select software that aligns with your unique needs, carefully assess must-have features such as:
Prioritizing these core functionalities will set your finance team up for lease accounting success.
While many solutions offer similar assurances of efficiency and accuracy, you need more than claims alone. Thoroughly evaluate contenders based on real-world use cases relevant to your organization before deciding.
By taking the time upfront to find software that truly aligns with your workflows, compliance needs, and budget, you’ll be rewarded with smoother audit processes, less time spent on calculations, and more strategic visibility into your lease portfolio over the long term.
See how we can help you find a perfect match in only 20 days. Interviewing candidates is free!
Book a CallYou can secure high-quality South American for around $9,000 USD per year. Interviewing candidates is completely free ofcharge.
You can secure high-quality South American talent in just 20 days and for around $9,000 USD per year.
Start Hiring For Free