We're a headhunter agency that connects US businesses with elite LATAM professionals who integrate seamlessly as remote team members — aligned to US time zones, cutting overhead by 70%.
We’ll match you with Latin American superstars who work your hours. Quality talent, no time zone troubles. Starting at $9/hour.
Start Hiring For FreeMost organizations would agree that accounting for government grants can be complex.
But properly recording grants is critical for accurate financial reporting. This article clearly explains the key principles behind grant accounting under both US GAAP and IFRS standards.
You'll learn the precise rules around recognizing grant revenue, the required journal entries, and what disclosures are mandatory. Real-world examples demonstrate proper accounting treatment and reporting to satisfy auditors and regulators.
Government grants provide financial assistance to businesses and individuals for assets, projects, or economic growth. Understanding the accounting treatment for these grants is important for proper financial reporting.
Government grants include:
Grants can come from federal, state, or local government agencies.
Key accounting principles for government grants include:
Proper accounting ensures accurate financial reporting of government assistance. Understanding these principles is key for accountants and financial analysts when recording grants.
Government grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the entity recognises expenses for the related costs for which the grants are intended to compensate. For grants related to assets, this requires setting up the grant as deferred income or deducting it from the carrying amount of the asset.
Some key points on accounting for government grants:
In summary, the key is to recognise government grants systematically over the periods in which the entity recognises the related costs for which the grants are intended to compensate. The grants can either be recognised in profit or loss or used to reduce the carrying amount of assets.
Capital grants received from the government should be recorded as deferred revenue on the balance sheet. The grant revenue should then be recognized over the useful life of the asset that was purchased with the grant money.
Here is an example of the accounting treatment for a capital grant:
Dr Cash $100,000
Cr Deferred Revenue $100,000
Dr Deferred Revenue $20,000
Cr Grant Revenue $20,000
So in summary:
For nonprofits like Vintti, there are no tax consequences to receiving a grant, as long as the funds are used to further the organization's mission. The accounting aims to match grant revenue with the related expenses over time.
IFRS and US GAAP have some key differences in how they treat accounting for government grants:
The main differences come down to IFRS having more prescriptive guidance based on the nature and conditions of grants, while US GAAP offers more flexibility in timing and approach for business entities.
Key factors when accounting for government grants are ensuring proper matching of income and expenses, presentation on financial statements, and adequate disclosure as required by each framework. Following the applicable standard helps ensure grants are accounted for appropriately.
Most government grants are not treated as revenue. Instead, government grants are accounted for in accordance with accounting standards such as GAAP or IFRS.
The accounting treatment depends on whether the grant is a capital grant or a revenue grant.
A capital grant is a grant given to purchase long-term assets like property, equipment, or software.
Accounting treatment under US GAAP:
This matches the grant income to the depreciation expense on the asset.
A revenue grant is given to support short-term programs or operating expenses.
Accounting treatment under US GAAP:
In both cases, the grant funds cannot be recognized until the conditions in the grant agreement are met. Careful review of each grant agreement is necessary to determine the proper accounting.
Consulting an accounting professional is advisable when accounting for government grants to ensure proper treatment. Key considerations include the type of grant, conditions, reporting requirements, and applicable accounting standards.
The key US GAAP standards that guide accounting treatment and financial reporting of government grants are FASB ASC 958-605 and FASB ASC 450-30. These provide guidance on revenue recognition, liability measurement, and disclosure requirements.
Under US GAAP, government grants are recognized as income when the conditions attached to the grant are substantially met. This usually aligns with the periods where related costs are incurred. If there are no conditions, the grant is recognized immediately. Grants related to assets are presented in the statement of financial position either by showing the grant as deferred income or deducting it in reporting the related asset.
Required disclosures include the accounting policy adopted, description of the grants, and an indication of other forms of government assistance with appropriate disclosure to indicate the nature, extent, and duration of the assistance.
FASB ASC 958-605 distinguishes between reciprocal transactions (exchange transactions) and nonreciprocal transactions (contributions). Government grants are typically considered exchange transactions as the resource provider often receives a commensurate value in return.
Contributions are recognized as revenue when received or promised. Promises from government entities should be evaluated to determine if they are enforceable and measurable under FAS 116 guidance. Conditional promises to give are recognized when conditions are substantially met.
IAS 20 outlines the accounting treatment and disclosure requirements for government grants and other forms of government assistance. Some key points:
Essentially, IAS 20 aims to ensure transparency and appropriate matching of income and expenses when accounting for government grants. The standard provides flexibility in terms of presentation, while enforcing discipline around recognition and disclosure.
There are some key differences between IAS 20 and US GAAP when it comes to accounting for government grants:
However, both standards agree on the fundamental principle of matching grant income with related expenses. Key disclosure requirements around the nature and extent of government assistance are also aligned. Overall, IAS 20 provides more prescriptive guidance while US GAAP grants more flexibility in certain areas of presentation.
This section outlines the key criteria that must be met before grant income can be recognized on financial statements under US GAAP.
To recognize grant revenue, an organization must first demonstrate that it has met all eligibility requirements set forth by the granting agency. This includes submitting required applications, reports, and other compliance documentation that shows the organization qualifies for the grant program. Some key requirements may include:
Organizations should maintain clear evidence of meeting requirements before recognizing any related grant income. This helps avoid potential clawbacks or repayments if compliance is questioned.
In addition to meeting initial eligibility criteria, organizations must also have reasonable assurance they will comply with all ongoing grant terms and conditions attached to the funding. This gives confidence that the granting agency will not revoke funds or require repayment.
Some examples include:
Establishing reasonable assurance helps validate recognition of the full grant amount under US GAAP. Reviewing and demonstrating compliance with all grant terms is key.
Capital grants are financial assistance provided by a government to a company for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, or upgrading physical non-current assets such as property, plant, and equipment. As per accounting standards like IAS 20 and ASC 958-605, capital grants should be accounted for similar to a donation - recognized directly in net assets/equity over the useful life of the asset acquired using the grant proceeds.
The key steps for accounting treatment are:
This avoids distorting operational results in the income statement.
Here is an example to illustrate capital grant accounting:
Company B received a government grant of $100,000 to purchase new equipment costing $150,000. The useful life of the equipment is 10 years.
Dr. Cash $100,000
Cr. Deferred Income $100,000
Dr. Equipment $150,000
Cr. Cash $150,000
This method appropriately accounts for capital grants directly in equity over the asset's useful life instead of recognizing an income statement gain.
This section provides detailed examples of journal entries for different types of government grants, illustrating the accounting process.
When a business receives a capital grant from the government, the following journal entries should be recorded:
Dr Cash $100,000
Cr Deferred Income $100,000
This records the cash received from the grant and recognizes it as a liability, reflecting that the conditions for income recognition have not yet been satisfied.
Year 1
Dr Deferred Income $20,000
Cr Grant Income $20,000
This recognizes the portion of the grant attributable to the current year's depreciation expense.
Year 2
Dr Deferred Income $20,000
Cr Grant Income $20,000
This continues recognizing the annual portion of the grant over the 5 year useful life of the asset.
The receipt of an operating grant would be recorded as follows:
Dr Cash $50,000
Cr Grant Income $50,000
This immediately recognizes the full grant amount as income in the period received, as long as all attached conditions have been satisfied.
Organizations receiving government assistance must make certain financial statement disclosures under GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Entities must describe the types of grant programs they participate in and the nature of any significant restrictions or requirements. For example:
Disclosures should provide investors transparency into the types of government assistance the entity depends on to operate. This allows financial statement users to assess the impact of such assistance on the sustainability of operations.
The amount of promises to give that do not yet meet all conditions for revenue recognition must be disclosed. For example, if a grant stipulates reimbursing costs incurred over a 3 year project period, any promised amounts not yet earned should be disclosed in the footnotes.
This provides clarity into grant amounts the entity reasonably expects to receive in the future, allowing financial statement users to forecast the impact on future period revenue recognition.
The disclosures for government grants and assistance allow investors to analyze financial reporting impacts, sustainability of operations, and future earnings potential resulting from such programs. Robust disclosure meets accounting standard requirements while providing transparency for financial statement users.
Properly accounting for government grants is critical for accurate financial reporting. Here are some key takeaways:
Adhere to strict revenue recognition principles when accounting for grant income. Recognize income only when performance obligations tied to the grant are satisfied.
Match grant income to the related expenses. This avoids distorting financial statements by recognizing income before incurring any costs.
Understand all terms and restrictions associated with a grant. This ensures proper classification and timing of revenue recognition.
Provide full transparency through disclosures in the financial statements. Disclose the nature, amounts, and any unfulfilled conditions or contingencies attached to grants.
In summary, properly accounting for grants requires careful analysis of the grant terms, prudent revenue recognition practices, clear matching of income and expenses, and complete financial statement disclosures. This maintains the integrity and understandability of the financial statements.
See how we can help you find a perfect match in only 20 days. Interviewing candidates is free!
Book a CallYou can secure high-quality South American for around $9,000 USD per year. Interviewing candidates is completely free ofcharge.
You can secure high-quality South American talent in just 20 days and for around $9,000 USD per year.
Start Hiring For Free