Most would agree that advancing legal education is critical for producing high-quality lawyers.
The American Bar Association (ABA) has played a major role in improving legal education standards over the past century. Specifically, the ABA's accreditation process has helped law schools provide a rigorous and comprehensive education.
In this article, we'll explore the ABA's history in legal education, its role in developing standards and accrediting law schools, key initiatives to enhance curriculums, and both the benefits and criticisms of the ABA's involvement. We'll also look ahead at potential changes to accreditation that could shape the future of legal training.
Introduction to the American Bar Association
The American Bar Association (ABA) is the largest voluntary association of lawyers in the world. It has over 400,000 members and plays a vital role in advancing the legal profession in the United States.
History and Mission of the ABA
The ABA was founded in 1878 with the goal of establishing standards for legal education and the profession. Its mission is to serve attorneys and improve the legal system for the public by:
- Setting standards for legal education and bar admissions
- Providing resources and professional development for lawyers
- Advocating for pro bono legal services and access to justice
- Promoting diversity and inclusion in the legal profession
Over its 140+ year history, the ABA has been instrumental in raising the standards for legal education, ethics, competence, and professionalism among lawyers.
ABA's Structure and Leadership
The ABA has a House of Delegates comprised of ~550 elected delegates that vote on policies and resolutions. The ABA also has many sections, divisions, and committees focused on specific legal practice areas.
The ABA president serves a 1-year term and oversees policymaking. The president appoints chairs and members for the 40+ ABA entities focused on key legal issues and areas of practice.
The ABA's Role in Legal Education
A core function of the ABA is overseeing and accrediting U.S. law schools. It has established standards for legal education that schools must meet to ensure quality and consistency.
Development of ABA Standards for Law Schools
The ABA has incrementally established more rigorous standards relating to curriculum, faculty, admissions, facilities, and other resources that law schools must meet. Some key developments include:
-
In 1921, the ABA first adopted resolution for law schools to meet minimum requirements relating to length of study, library sizes, and faculty-to-student ratios.
-
In 1923, the ABA established the Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar to formally accredit law schools.
-
Over the decades, the Council has regularly strengthened the ABA law school approval standards. Recent changes include increased requirements for practical skills training and professionalism.
-
The standards address major aspects of a law school's operations - governance, program of legal education, faculty, admissions, library and information resources, facilities and technological capacities.
By improving the standards over time, the ABA aims to ensure that accredited law schools provide a sound program of legal education.
Law School Accreditation Process
The ABA conducts in-depth reviews of law schools through site evaluations to confirm compliance with all accreditation standards:
-
The process focuses on factors relating to the quality of the educational program, learning environment, and student achievements.
-
Teams of 3-5 educators and practitioners visit the law schools to directly evaluate facilities, resources, curriculum and more.
-
Following a site visit, the Accreditation Committee reviews the findings and makes a determination on the school's compliance and accreditation status.
-
Accredited schools are reevaluated every 7 years to maintain approval. Schools must also submit annual questionnaires and reports for regular monitoring.
The rigorous ABA inspection process aims to uphold minimum quality thresholds legal education across accredited law schools.
sbb-itb-e93bf99
ABA Initiatives to Improve Legal Education
The ABA implements many initiatives aimed at enhancing the quality and delivery of legal education at accredited law schools.
Curriculum Recommendations
The ABA provides curriculum recommendations focused on preparing law students with practical skills and knowledge for legal practice. Some key initiatives include:
-
Recommending that schools incorporate more practical skills training into the curriculum such as legal writing, research, trial advocacy, and clinical experiences. This helps bridge the gap between legal theory and practice.
-
Emphasizing professional development and professional identity formation as critical parts of legal education. This includes understanding ethics, civility, and what it means to be a legal professional.
-
Encouraging opportunities for experiential learning through clinics, externships, and simulations. Applying classroom knowledge to real or simulated cases promotes competence and deeper learning.
-
Promoting innovation in curriculum development and teaching methods to engage students and respond to the changing legal landscape.
Standards for Online Education
With online education growing rapidly, the ABA established standards to ensure quality for online J.D. programs. Key standards include:
-
Requiring equivalent content, rigor, and quality between online and in-person programs at the same school. Online students should receive a comparable education.
-
Mandating meaningful interaction between faculty and students and among students. Distance learning depends on vibrant discussion and collaboration.
-
Ensuring exams and assessments have integrity and identity verification methods. This maintains academic rigor for online students.
-
Requiring orientation programs addressing technology competence and access. This levels the playing field for online students.
By driving curriculum enhancements and online education standards, the ABA enables law schools to improve legal education and prepare practice-ready graduates.
Benefits and Critiques of the ABA's Role
The ABA's regulation of legal education provides some benefits but also faces reasonable criticism regarding accreditation costs and barriers to innovation. A balanced discussion allows us to thoughtfully consider reforms while preserving valuable aspects of the current system.
Benefits for Legal Education
The ABA's accreditation process aims to ensure law schools meet minimum quality standards for legal training. This provides confidence to students that they will receive adequate preparation for legal careers. Key benefits include:
-
Higher Education Standards: Accreditation requirements raise the baseline quality of legal education programs. This helps ensure new lawyers have sufficient training and capabilities before entering the profession.
-
Student Assurance: Meeting ABA standards signals to students that a law school provides the necessary education and resources for them to succeed in legal careers. This gives students more confidence when choosing a law school.
-
Professional Mobility: The ABA system facilitates reciprocity across states for licensing and bar admissions. This increases lawyers' professional mobility after graduation.
While reasonable people can disagree on specifics, many agree the ABA plays a valuable role in promoting quality, confidence, and mobility in legal education.
Criticisms and Reform Efforts
However, some criticize the ABA system as overregulating legal education in ways that drive up costs and limit beneficial innovations. Key critiques include:
-
High Compliance Costs: Complying with all ABA accreditation standards entails significant administrative, facility, and personnel expenses for law schools. Some argue this unnecessarily drives up tuition.
-
Barriers to Innovation: Strict ABA requirements around curriculum, facilities, administration, etc. allow little room for experimentation with new models of legal education. This may limit cost-reducing innovations.
-
Faculty Publishing Requirements: Some faculty feel pressure to focus excessively on academic publishing rather than practical legal training to meet ABA scholarship expectations.
There are good-faith arguments on multiple sides of these issues. Reasonable reforms could aim to reduce unnecessary burdens while preserving quality safeguards. The ABA itself continues working to balance these considerations. But more openness to alternative accreditation models could also foster beneficial innovation in legal education.
Looking Ahead: The Future of ABA-Accredited Legal Education
While the ABA's law school accreditation role has been controversial, the organization will likely continue setting standards as online and hybrid J.D. programs grow.
Potential Changes to Accreditation Criteria
As more law schools experiment with distance learning models and competency-based education, the ABA may need to modify or add accreditation criteria to ensure quality while enabling innovation. Potential changes could include:
-
Updating standards around synchronous instruction, scheduling flexibility, and learning outcomes assessment for online/hybrid programs.
-
Allowing more flexibility in faculty credentials and course delivery methods.
-
Emphasizing competency-based measures over input measures like faculty ratios or library sizes.
-
Adding criteria focused on technology infrastructure and student support services.
Any changes would likely aim to maintain rigor while removing potential barriers for law schools developing new delivery models.
Maintaining Quality Control
Even amidst changes in legal education models, the ABA aims to ensure law graduates receive adequate practical training for bar admission and effective law practice. As such, the ABA will likely continue holding schools accountable for outcomes like:
-
Bar exam passage rates
-
Job placement rates
-
Rigorous curriculum covering core legal knowledge and skills
-
Opportunities for experiential learning
-
Student support services
-
Sound admissions policies
-
Financial stability
By preserving a focus on quality control and positive student outcomes, the ABA can enable innovation while fulfilling its central accreditation mission.
