Operating Lease vs Finance Lease

When examining leases, most accountants would agree that distinguishing between operating and finance leases can be confusing.

By understanding key differences in ownership, risk, costs, and accounting treatments, you can confidently navigate lease complexities.

In this post, we will compare operating versus finance leases across criteria like flexibility, balance sheet impacts, and real-world examples. You will also learn how new standards under ASC 842 are changing operating lease reporting. Let's clarify the distinctions!

Introduction to Leasing: Operating Lease vs Finance Lease

Leasing is a common way for businesses to acquire the use of assets without purchasing them outright. There are two main types of leases in accounting - operating leases and finance leases. Understanding the key differences between these lease types is important for proper accounting treatment and financial reporting.

Understanding the Basics of Leases in Financial Accounting

A lease is a contract that conveys the right to use an asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration, usually in the form of payments. The two parties involved are the lessor (owner of the asset) and the lessee (user of the asset).

In financial accounting, leases are classified as either operating leases or finance leases depending on the terms of the lease contract. The key factors that determine lease classification are:

• Transfer of Ownership: Finance leases transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee, whereas operating leases do not.
• Lease Term: Finance leases cover a major part of the economic life of an asset, while operating leases have a shorter lease term.
• Present Value of Payments: If the present value of the minimum lease payments amounts to at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset, it is a finance lease.

The lease classification then dictates the accounting treatment and impacts the financial statements differently.

Operating Lease vs Finance Lease vs Capital Lease: A Comparative Overview

Below is a comparison of the main features between operating, finance, and capital leases:

Ownership Transfer:

• Operating Lease - Ownership stays with lessor
• Finance Lease - Ownership transfers to lessee
• Capital Lease - Ownership transfers to lessee

Lease Term:

• Operating Lease - Covers only small portion of asset life
• Finance Lease - Covers major part of asset economic life
• Capital Lease - Covers 75% or more of asset life

Payments:

• Operating Lease - Usually fixed payments
• Finance Lease - Usually varying payments covering cost plus interest
• Capital Lease - Similar to finance lease

Balance Sheet Treatment:

• Operating Lease - Asset remains on lessor books
• Finance Lease - Asset goes on lessee books
• Capital Lease - Similar to finance lease

Expense Treatment:

• Operating Lease - Recorded as rental expense
• Finance Lease - Recorded as depreciation expense and interest expense
• Capital Lease - Similar to finance lease

So in summary, finance and capital leases transfer substantial ownership rights to the lessee compared to operating leases. This necessitates different accounting treatment, especially for assets and expenses.

What is the difference between finance lease and operating lease?

The key differences between a finance lease and an operating lease relate to the length of the lease term, asset ownership, and accounting treatment.

Finance Lease

• Long-term lease, covering majority of asset's useful life
• Lessee takes on substantial risks and rewards of ownership
• Asset recorded on lessee's balance sheet
• Lessee claims depreciation expense on asset

Operating Lease

• Short-term lease
• Lessor retains risks and rewards of ownership
• Asset remains on lessor's balance sheet
• Lessee claims lease expenses on income statement

In summary:

• Finance leases are like financing the purchase of an asset - the lessee accounts for the asset on their balance sheet and depreciates it.

• Operating leases are like renting the asset - the lessor retains the asset on their books while the lessee records periodic rental expenses.

The key factor in classifying a lease is the transfer of risks and rewards. If substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are passed to the lessee, it qualifies as a finance lease. Otherwise, it is generally an operating lease.

What is the difference between finance lease and operating lease journal entries?

The key differences between finance lease and operating lease journal entries relate to how the lease assets and liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet, as well as the pattern of expense recognition over the lease term.

Finance Lease Journal Entries

Under a finance lease, the lessee records a lease asset (fixed asset) and a lease liability on its balance sheet at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Here are the key journal entries:

• At lease commencement, the lessee debits "Lease Asset" and credits "Lease Liability" to record the present value of future minimum lease payments.
• Over the lease term, the lessee debits "Interest Expense" and credits "Lease Liability" to record interest on the lease liability.
• The lessee also debits "Depreciation Expense" and credits "Accumulated Depreciation" to depreciate the lease asset.

This means the total lease cost is front-loaded, with more interest expense recorded in earlier periods.

Operating Lease Journal Entries

Under an operating lease, the lessee does not record a lease asset or liability on its balance sheet. The only journal entry over the lease term is:

• Debit "Lease/Rent Expense" and credit "Cash" for each rental payment.

So the total lease cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. There is no interest or depreciation recorded.

In summary, the key difference is that finance leases impact the balance sheet, whereas operating leases only impact the income statement. Finance leases also have front-loaded total lease costs due to interest and depreciation expenses.

What is the difference between a true lease and a finance lease?

The key differences between a true lease and a finance lease lie in the allocation of risks and rewards associated with the leased asset.

In a true lease:

• The lessor retains ownership of the asset and assumes the risks and rewards of the residual value.
• The lessee only capitalizes the rental payments on their income statement.
• There is no transfer of ownership at the end of the lease term.

In a finance lease:

• The lessee assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, even though the lessor retains legal title.
• The lessee capitalizes the leased asset on their balance sheet and depreciates it.
• There is usually a transfer of ownership at the end of the lease term or a bargain purchase option.

Essentially, a true lease is an operating lease where the lessor retains economic ownership. A finance lease transfers economic ownership to the lessee - it is closer to an installment purchase than a rental agreement.

Under US GAAP and IFRS, classification as a finance lease vs operating lease depends on meeting any one of five criteria. These criteria assess the transfer of ownership risks and rewards.

So in summary, the key difference lies in who assumes the asset's risks and rewards - the lessor in a true lease, or the lessee in a finance lease. The accounting and balance sheet treatment differs accordingly.

What is the difference between operating lease and finance lease right of use asset?

The key differences between operating and finance leases relate to how the right-of-use (ROU) asset is treated on the balance sheet.

Operating Lease

• The ROU asset is not capitalized on the balance sheet. The ROU asset balance is effectively expensed through the systematic recognition of lease expenses on the income statement over the lease term.
• Lease expenses are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. This leads to higher expenses in earlier years of the lease term.

Finance Lease

• The ROU asset is capitalized on the balance sheet at commencement and amortized over the shorter of the asset’s useful life or lease term.
• Interest expense decreases while amortization expense increases over the lease term, leading to lower total expenses in earlier years.
• Requires recognition of interest expense and amortization expense separately on the income statement.

In summary, operating leases result in higher income statement expenses in earlier years while finance leases result in higher assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Under both types, the total cash flows are the same, but the timing of expense recognition differs.

sbb-itb-beb59a9

Distinguishing Between Operating and Finance Leases

Operating and finance leases have key differences when it comes to ownership, terms, payments, accounting treatment, taxes, and risk transfer. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for businesses to make informed leasing decisions.

Ownership and Risk Transfer in Operating Lease vs Finance Lease

The main difference lies in who retains ownership of the asset:

• Operating Lease: The lessor retains ownership of the asset. The lessee rents the asset for a portion of its economic life. Risk and rewards stay predominantly with the lessor.

• Finance Lease: Ownership of the asset is transferred to the lessee at the end of the lease term. The lessee bears substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of the asset.

In essence, a finance lease is similar to the purchase of an asset, while an operating lease is true rental.

Lease Terms: Flexibility vs Long-Term Commitment

Operating and finance leases also differ in the typical lease terms:

• Operating Lease: Typically short-term (less than the economic life of the asset). Gives lessees more flexibility to change assets, locations, etc.

• Finance Lease: Tend to run for the major part of the economic life of the asset. Lessee commits to long-term use of the asset.

The longer lease term commitment places a larger financial obligation on the lessee under a finance lease.

Operating Lease vs Finance Lease Cost Considerations

Operating Leases tend to have lower periodic rental payments. Costs are expensed on the income statement leading to lower assets/liabilities on balance sheet.

Finance Leases require the asset and liability to be recorded on the balance sheet. Can impact debt covenants and capital restrictions. The lessee bears the risks/rewards of ownership.

In summary, the differences in ownership, terms, payments and accounting treatment significantly impact the economics and risk profile of the two lease types. Businesses should carefully assess their needs.

Accounting Treatment of Leases Under IFRS and US GAAP

This section covers how operating and finance leases are treated on financial statements under both IFRS and US GAAP.

Balance Sheet Impact: Operating Lease vs Finance Lease IFRS 16

Under IFRS 16, operating leases are recognized on the balance sheet, whereas previously they were off-balance sheet. The right-of-use asset and lease liability are recorded for operating leases.

In contrast, finance leases continue to be recognized on the balance sheet under IFRS 16, similar to previous standards. The leased asset is recorded along with the obligation to pay lease installments.

The key difference on the balance sheet between operating and finance leases under IFRS 16 is that finance leases recognize the actual leased asset, while operating leases recognize a right-of-use asset.

Depreciation and Interest: Finance Lease Accounting Under US GAAP

For lessees, finance leases are capitalized under US GAAP by recording the leased asset and lease liability. The asset is then depreciated over the shorter of its useful life or lease term. An interest expense is recorded each period on the lease liability using the effective interest method.

This differs from operating leases, where no depreciation or interest expense is recorded. Only the lease payments are expensed.

Operating Lease vs Finance Lease Accounting Treatment: GAAP vs IFRS

The main differences in accounting treatment between GAAP and IFRS are:

• Operating leases are on-balance sheet under IFRS but off-balance sheet under GAAP
• IFRS has a single lease accounting model, while GAAP has separate guidance for finance and operating leases
• More leases qualify as finance leases under IFRS compared to GAAP
• IFRS does not differentiate between real estate and non-real estate leases like GAAP

So in summary, IFRS brings more leases onto the balance sheet as compared to GAAP.

Lease vs Rent: Accounting Distinctions in Financial Reporting

The main accounting difference between leases and rent is that leases convey the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time. Rent is considered an operating expense.

Leases create assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, impacting financial ratios. Rent is expensed on the income statement without any balance sheet impact.

Classification as a lease versus rent depends on factors like the ability to direct how and for what purpose the asset is used during the contract period. This determines the accounting treatment and subsequent impact on financial reporting.

Real-World Examples: Operating Lease vs Finance Lease

This section provides straightforward examples comparing operating leases and finance leases, focusing on key differences in accounting treatment.

Operating Lease Example: Accounting for a Commercial Property Lease

• Company A signs a 5-year lease for new office space
• The lease payments are $2,000 per month
• Under an operating lease, Company A does not capitalize the leased asset on its balance sheet
• Company A records a monthly rent expense of $2,000
• The future lease payments are disclosed in the financial statement footnotes

Finance Lease Example: Capitalizing an Industrial Equipment Lease

• Company B leases a piece of machinery for 3 years
• The leased equipment has a fair value of $30,000
• Under a finance lease, Company B capitalizes the $30,000 on its balance sheet
• Company B records depreciation expense on the equipment over the 3 year lease term
• The liability for future lease payments is also recorded on the balance sheet

Operating Lease vs Finance Lease Example: Comparing Two Scenarios

• Both leases involve payment of periodic rent
• But under an operating lease the asset stays off the balance sheet
• While a finance lease requires capitalizing the leased asset
• Finance leases also lead to depreciation and interest expense
• Operating leases result in higher periodic rent payments over time

In summary, the main differences come down to balance sheet treatment and expenses recorded. Operating leases function more like a rental agreement while finance leases are essentially financing arrangements.

Compliance with New Standards: Operating Lease vs Finance Lease ASC 842

The implementation of ASC 842 has led to significant changes in lease accounting. Organizations following US GAAP must understand the new standards for classifying and reporting both operating and finance leases.

Transitioning to ASC 842: Impact on Operating Lease Reporting

Under ASC 842, operating leases are now recognized on the balance sheet. This differs from previous US GAAP, where operating leases did not impact the balance sheet. The new standard requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for operating leases.

Key impacts include:

• ROU assets and lease liabilities must be calculated based on the present value of future lease payments
• Lease expense recognition changes from straight-line to front-loaded
• Additional disclosures around leases are required

Organizations need to gather extensive data on leases and implement changes to processes and systems for compliance.

Finance Lease Considerations Under ASC 842: What Lessees Need to Know

ASC 842 aligns the finance lease classification criteria more closely with IFRS 16 rules. Under the new standard, a lease that meets any of the following criteria should be classified as a finance lease:

• The lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee
• The lessee has an option to purchase the asset below fair market value
• The lease term covers a major part of the asset's economic life
• The present value of lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the asset's fair value

For finance leases, ASC 842 retains similar accounting treatment to previous US GAAP:

• Leased asset and liability are recognized on the balance sheet
• Interest expense and amortization recognized separately in the income statement

Lessees will need to reassess lease classifications and ensure the balance sheet reflects assets and liabilities from finance leases appropriately.

Capital Lease vs Finance Lease: Dissecting the Differences

Finance leases and capital leases have key differences in their accounting treatment and classification criteria. With the introduction of new lease accounting standards under IFRS 16 and ASC 842, the terminology has shifted more towards referring to leases as either finance or operating. However, understanding capital vs finance leases under the old standards still provides helpful context.

Terminology and Classification: Capital Lease vs Finance Lease

• A capital lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. A finance lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards related to ownership as well.

• Capital leases are classified based on meeting one or more of four criteria related to lease term, ownership transfer, bargain purchase option, and present value of payments. Finance leases use similar but updated classification criteria.

• Under IFRS 16 and ASC 842, the terms "capital lease" and "finance lease" can be used interchangeably when referring to the new classifications.

Accounting for Capital Leases: A Historical Perspective

• Before the new standards, capital leases were treated similarly to purchased assets, recorded on the balance sheet with depreciation expense.

• Assets under capital leases did not affect debt ratios as significantly as other types of financing. This provided incentives for some companies to structure leases to meet capital lease classification criteria.

• Understanding the previous capital lease treatment provides helpful context, but the specifics have been superseded under the new standards. The concepts still underpin the reasoning for finance lease accounting.

Finance and capital leases have overlapped concepts, but the terminology and criteria have evolved with the new standards. Tracing the history provides context for why finance leases receive a "right-of-use" assets treatment similar to purchased assets.

Conclusion: Navigating the Complexities of Lease Accounting

In summary, key differences between operating and finance leases relate to ownership transfer, terms, payments, risk, and accounting rules under both IFRS and US GAAP standards.

Summarizing Operating Lease vs Finance Lease Considerations

Operating and finance leases have distinct implications for businesses. Key considerations include:

• Ownership Transfer: Operating leases do not transfer asset ownership. Finance leases transfer ownership by the end of the lease term.
• Lease Term: Operating leases are generally short-term (less than the asset's useful life). Finance leases span a major part of the asset's economic life.
• Payments: Operating lease payments are expensed. Finance leases record lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.
• Risks and Rewards: Operating leases have risks held by the lessor. Finance leases shift substantially all risks to the lessee.
• Accounting Treatment: Operating leases have straight-line rent expenses. Finance leases depreciate lease assets and recognize interest expense.

In deciding between lease types, businesses should weigh costs, balance sheet impacts, risks, and accounting complexities. Consultation with accounting advisors is recommended.

Future Trends in Lease Accounting: Operating Lease vs Finance Lease

Ongoing convergence of IFRS and US GAAP standards may lead to further changes in lease accounting rules. Potential developments include:

• Simplified risk/rewards tests to distinguish between lease types
• Expanded disclosures for operating leases on the balance sheet
• Greater consistency in defining lease terms and payments
• Updated guidance on sale-leaseback transactions

Businesses should monitor lease accounting standards and work closely with advisors to navigate changes. Proactive financial planning can help minimize impacts from evolving guidelines. Understanding the basics - like key operating vs. finance lease differences - provides a solid foundation.

Related posts

• What is a Leasehold Improvement?
• Lease Accounting: Lessor Accounting Practices
• Lease Accounting: Understanding ASC 842 Requirements
• What is an Operating Lease?